Who Actually Talks to the State Legislature? A Look at the Lobbying Registry
dieKunstBauStelle e. V. is now listed at the federal and state levels
When decisions are made in Munich or Berlin about cultural funding programs, there’s rarely anyone at the table who just happens to be passing by.
Anyone who engages in ongoing political discussions with Parliament and the government must register in the lobbyist registry—the public directory that shows who represents which interests. The Bundestag has maintained its registry since January 2022.
The Bavarian State Parliament, too. What can you find there?
The Bavarian State Parliament’s lobby registry contains approximately 944 entries for the 2025 reporting year. From farmers’ associations to chambers of pharmacists, energy providers, industry associations, and local government organizations, the register includes what one would expect. And much that one might not have on their radar—from all sectors of the economy, representing every conceivable economic interest.
However, anyone searching for “culture of remembrance” there will find no results. Nor will anyone searching for “memorial work.” In a state with Bavaria’s history—Dachau, Flossenbürg, Landsberg, Munich as the movement’s capital—coming to terms with the Nazi past is not a minor issue. Yet it does not appear in the index of formally organized political consultation.
At the federal level, the situation is less dramatic, but similar. Under “Culture of Remembrance,” there are eight entries, three of which relate to Nazi history. Under “Memorial Sites,” there are two more. That’s all there is.
That surprised us
Once we saw that, the question was no longer whether we would sign up, but how quickly we would do it.
Since June 12, 2026, dieKunstBauStelle e. V. has been listed in the German Bundestag’s lobby registry under registration number R008055. Since June 20, 2026, we have also been listed under registration number DEBYLT04A1 in the lobbying registry of the Bavarian State Parliament. As things stand, this makes us the only civil society organization dedicated to remembrance culture in Bavaria that is formally listed there.
This is in connection with our ongoing discussions with members of the Bundestag and the Bavarian State Parliament, as well as with the Federal Ministry of Culture and Media—at the federal level regarding the future of federal funding for remembrance culture, and at the state level regarding the expansion of digital remembrance culture as an independent area of funding. Anyone who regularly engages in such discussions is required to register under the lobbying registry laws of the federal government and the Free State of Bavaria. There is no longer a voluntary option once the contacts go beyond individual cases.
Why This Is More Than Just an Administrative Act
Today, the lobby registry is the first place where lawmakers and government agencies look to find out who they can speak with about a particular issue. Anyone not listed there does not appear on the political radar. For the culture of remembrance at the state level, this has meant, until now, that there are no direct points of contact from civil society. At the federal level, there are a few actors—but too few to represent the full breadth of the field.
This stems from our two flagship projects: the NaziCrimesAtlas and the digital cataloging of Nazi memorial sites in Bavaria. Both projects carry out work for which no reliable funding is provided under existing funding mechanisms. Anyone working without basic institutional funding falls through the cracks. This applies to us as well as to many other smaller organizations dedicated to remembrance culture.
Upon registration, we take on two responsibilities:
We bring together the concerns of smaller, non-institutionally funded organizations dedicated to remembrance and present them to the Bundestag, the Federal Government, the Bavarian State Parliament, and the State Government. At the same time, as a specialized organization, we are available to provide information and advice to members of parliament, ministries, foundations, local organizations, and colleagues working in the field.
Registration is mandatory — and transparency in action
Anyone who regularly or on an ongoing basis discusses funding programs or legal frameworks with members of parliament, parliamentary caucuses, or governments is required to register under the Lobby Registry Act. At the federal level, this requirement applies all the way down to department heads within the ministries.
The registry publicly shows who we are, where our funding comes from, and what causes we advocate for. This transparency is part of the process.
The association represents its own interests, not those of third parties. Wolfgang Hauck performs this work on a volunteer basis.
Complete entries:
Bavarian Lobby Register (DEBYLT04A1): https://lobbyregister.bayern.landtag.de
Federal Lobby Register (R008055): https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R008055
How do you convey a story that meets with resistance?
Tour and discussion at the former Kaufering VII subcamp – May 12, 2026
On Tuesday, May 12, 2026, a tour took place at the former Kaufering VII subcamp near Landsberg-Erpfting, which had a different focus than comparable tours. The focus was not on the history of the camp itself, but on the question of the conditions under which its communication succeeds – and where it fails.
The event was part of the practical semester at Augsburg University of Applied Sciences: social work students on the Methodological Professionalism III module, led by Prof. Martin Stummbaum, explored genocide and the culture of remembrance as a field of social work on site. The tour was accompanied by Wolfgang Hauck, lecturer at Augsburg University of Applied Sciences and initiator of the NaziCrimesAtlas and BayernHistoryApp projects.
The tour used digital access to both applications – including contributions that Wolfgang Hauck had developed together with the late Manfred Deiler, President of the European Holocaust Memorial Foundation, and the historian Dr. Edith Raim. Both have since passed away: Manfred Deiler on November 12, 2023, Dr. Edith Raim on July 1, 2025. Their contributions will remain accessible as part of the digital memory of this place.
The tour was followed by an open discussion in the parking lot, in which students and citizens from Landsberg and the district took part.
Participants
- Students in the module Methodological Professionalism III: Practice Research and Quality (in) Social Work, Augsburg University of Applied Sciences
- Prof. Martin Stummbaum, Augsburg University of Applied Sciences (module leader)
- Wolfgang Hauck, lecturer at TH Augsburg, board member of dieKunstBauStelle e.V. (tour guide)
- Interested members of the public
Picture gallery

Information and digital access
Background
The former Kaufering VII subcamp was one of eleven camps in the Kaufering subcamp complex – the largest subcamp complex of Dachau concentration camp. The preservation of the site is largely due to the commitment of the Landsberg Citizens’ Association, which was founded in 1983. For the historical context of the site and the history of coming to terms with the past after 1945, please refer to the documentation of the discussion from 2021.
Taking stock of Landsberg’s culture of remembrance
Discussion and protest action by Omas gegen Rechts on August 14, 2021 in Landsberg am Lech
Short link to this article: https://bit.ly/Diskussion2021
Dossier for discussion: Dossier for the discussion of 2021 [PDF]
Addendum April 2026
Two of the four participants in this discussion have since passed away: Manfred Deiler on November 12, 2023, and Dr. Edith Raim on July 1, 2025. Their contributions thus bear witness to a generation that has come to terms with and passed on the legacy of Landsberg’s Nazi history. The video document and the authorized transcription remain accessible as a primary source. Due to current events, we have revised the sound quality of the 2026 video recording and re-recorded the contribution.
The occasion
On Saturday, August 14, 2021, members of the Munich regional group of the “Omas gegen Rechts” initiative came to Landsberg am Lech for a stocktaking and protest action.
The reason for the protest was the planned naming of a new building in the “Urbanes Leben am Papierbach” residential area as the “Karl Schrem Building”. Karl Schrem (1895-1981) was the director of the former Bayerische Pflugfabrik – an armaments factory with forced labor during the Second World War – and a member of the NSDAP since 1938.
The public justification strategies, trivialization and condoning by the town, the press, letters to the editor and social media have caused concern outside Landsberg. In addition to a tour of the former Kaufering VII subcamp, a discussion on the situation and status of Landsberg’s culture of remembrance took place at dieKunstBauStelle e.V. in the evening.
The discussion is reproduced here as video documentation. An edited transcription of the contributions to the discussion, authorized by all participants, is available.

Participants in the discussion
- Dr. habil. Edith Raim † , historian, lecturer at the University of Augsburg, numerous publications on Landsberg’s Nazi history and Nazi justice
- Gabriele Triebel, Member of the Bavarian State Parliament, Alliance 90/The Greens
- Manfred Deiler † , President of the European Holocaust Memorial Foundation e.V.
- Wolfgang Hauck, artist, project developer of the culture of remembrance, board member of dieKunstBauStelle e.V., (moderator)
Notes on documentation
The first report on the event was published on August 18, 2021. The video recording and transcription followed in September 2021. In April 2026, the sound quality of the video recording was revised and the report was reclassified due to the current situation.
Movie
Link to the movie: https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/588825293
Transcription of the speeches
Article
- 13.08.2021 Landsberger Tagblatt: Protest grandmas against the right against naming “Kar l Schrem Bau”
- 18.08.2021 District messenger: Inventory and visit
Dossier
2026 Dossier for the discussion of 2021
Sources
Further press articles on the naming debate
Discussion of the naming of the Karl Schrem Bau 2021 and reports on the visit of the Omas gegen Rechts in Landsberg am Lech.
Online
The access status of the following links is August 2022. Individual sources have been changed or removed since then (see notes).
Landsberg am Lech district messenger
- https://www.kreisbote.de/lokales/landsberg/karl-schrem-bau-leben-am-papierbach-gelaende-landsberg-muss-abgerissen-werden-10352612.html
- https://www.kreisbote.de/lokales/landsberg/karl-schrem-bau-papierbach-landsberg-wird-abgerissen-11063531.html
- https://www.merkur.de/lokales/landsberg-kreisbote/erinnerungskultur-muenchener-omas-gegen-rechts-zu-besuch-in-landsberg-90923520.html
- https://www.merkur.de/lokales/landsberg-kreisbote/namenssuche-beim-landsberger-ulp-runde-91035410.html
Landsberger Tagblatt
- https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/landsberg/Landsberg-Landsberg-Omas-gegen-Rechts-protestieren-gegen-Karl-Schrem-Bau-id60302431.html
- https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/landsberg/ULP-Neuer-Name-fuer-Karl-Schrem-Bau-in-Landsberg-Kritik-am-ULP-Investor-id60562441.html
- ehret+klein
https://www.ehret-klein.de/presse/landsberg-hat-abgestimmt-so-heissen-die-sechs-gebaeude-im-suedlichen-bauabschnitt/ - https://www.ehret-klein.de/presse/am-papierbach-der-ehem-karl-schrem-bau-heisst-nun-sternrad-haus/
- City of Landsberg am Lech: probably deleted in 2024
https://www.landsberg.de/kultur/stadtgeschichte/die-pflugfabrik-karl-schrem/ - City of Landsberg: Karl Schrem (still included in the demo version of the new version of the website=
https://neu.landsberg.de/kultur/stadtgeschichte/die-pflugfabrik-karl-schrem - Marjorie-Wiki: Karl Schrem, copy of the first Wikipedia entry, deleted due to lack of relevance
- Grannies against the right
https://omasgegenrechtsmuenchen.de/omas-gegen-rechts-muenchen-in-landsberg-am-14-8-21/
Sources as PDF documents
- 20210818 Kreisbote-Landsberg Article Discussion
- 20210816 Landsberger Tagblatt, page 26: Grannies against the right Landsberg
- 20210811 Landsberger Tagblatt, page 24: Karl Schrem protest article
- 20210814 Landsberger Tagblatt, page 21: Investor to Schrem article
- 20210611 Landsberger Tagblatt, page 26: Reaction to open letter
- 20210807 Landsberger Tagblatt, page 22: Article on the naming of Karl Schrem
- 20210616 Kreisbote-Landsberg: Commentary
- 20210616 Kreisbote-Landsberg: Culture of remembrance Article
- 20210609 Landsberger Tagblatt, page 25: Article criticizing OB Baumgartl
- 20200819 Landsberger Tagblatt: ULP name competition article
- 20200709 Landsberger Tagblatt: ULP naming call article
- 20200914 Press release e+k Naming Landsberg has voted
- 20210609 Submission Landsberg Cultural Committee Culture of Remembrance
- 20210608_Offener Brief_an_Doris_Baumgartl




